Introduction - What we are going to do is describe the legal and
mechanical process relating to offshore bank failures. We will discuss
what leads up to them, what happens if they fail, and how do the
depositors get their money back. The terms and scenarios we depict are
generally what happens in the world of offshore banking. In some
jurisdictions the terminology and procedures may be slightly different
but the general way things proceed will be in line with the scenarios
depicted in this article.
Offshore
Banks - A brief definition of this term is in order. These are banks
that are located in various countries around the world many being in
Caribbean Island Nations. These banks have a license that enables them
to only do business with people and entities (trusts and corporations)
that are not from that country. The offshore jurisdiction does not trust
the offshore bank to accept deposits from its citizens or corporation
filed in that country. This right away should tell a moderately astute
investor that he or she is perhaps not exercising the correct amount of
caution when it comes to selecting a bank and an offshore jurisdiction.
So the first warning sign is be careful of offshore banking licenses. A
bank can be in an offshore jurisdiction and not have an offshore banking
license, instead be a regularly licensed bank. Offshore bank licenses
can be had in some jurisdictions with as little as a $50,000 deposit
with the country issuing the license. Usually this amount is never more
than $500,000 and many countries require less. As a point of comparison a
regular bank operating in Panama is required to post $10,000,000 cash
deposit and the owners go through a rigorous background investigation.
Bank
Failure - This is a term relating to the offshore bank being unable to
fulfill the demand for funds from their depositors. This can occur for a
number of reasons, some bad and some not so bad. The offshore bank may
have been found to be below its protective ratios and the government
bank auditors or financial ministry may decide to shut the bank down in
terms of money going out for a limited period of time to see if the bank
can return their ratios quickly to an acceptable level. In the event
the ratios return to an acceptable level the bank operation resumes
normally and the depositors may not even know anything occurred.
Complaints
- The way offshore bank failures generally start is with complaints to
the licensing authority of the country where the bank is located stating
that requests to withdraw funds are not being met by the bank. To
document this the account holder generally retains legal counsel in the
country where the offshore bank is located and files a formal demand for
the funds to bank with a very short deadline. When this demand is not
met the law firm will file a formal complaint to the offshore bank
licensing authority who will generally conduct an investigation. They
may have their own auditors or hire an independent team of auditors to
go through the offshore bank records. They will look to see if there are
any loans on the books that do not meet the guidelines for lending such
as writing uncollateralized loans is usually considered an offense.
Loans to the principals of the bank are another red flag. Real estate
acquisitions like mansions on the island where the offshore bank is
located for the bank executives to live in is another red flag as well.
Usually without loans the bank would not fail to meet its ratios. When
these loans go bad and there is no collateral to go after then the banks
get into trouble. The complaint process is possibly the only way the
government is going to know their offshore bank is in trouble and by
then it may be too late, but it may not be too late. Remember we are
talking about offshore banks here, not regularly licensed regular banks
which are audited and watched way more closely by the government and
usually by a different government agency than the agency supervising
offshore banks. We as a Panama Law firm do not introduce clients to
offshore banks which should tell you something.
Loss of
Correspondent Bank - Sometimes the offshore bank has just lost one or
more of its correspondent banks and can not execute wire transfers until
it replaces the correspondent with another correspondent bank which may
take several weeks. When the complaints hit the government they will
investigate, see that the funds are in place and allow the offshore bank
a reasonable period of time to secure another correspondent bank,
checking with them for progress reports. This is a not so bad problem
that will only serve to scare and inconvenience the depositors.
Offshore
Bank Receivership - This is a process whereby the government agency
that licenses the offshore bank takes over the offshore bank to control
its operation with an eye towards saving the bank. Sometimes they are
successful and well sometimes not. Often a team of professionals from a
large auditing or accounting firm are brought in. Receivership practices
can frequently mean that a percentage of your funds will be unavailable
for withdrawal for sometime. This is to prevent a run on the offshore
bank which would for sure topple it and thus cost the depositors
substantial losses. You may be only able to take out say 25% of your
funds. What can often happen is the depositors lose faith and take as
much money out as they can and avoid putting in any more money. This
usually results in the offshore bank failing totally and being shut
down.
Suing the Offshore Bank - What often happens in these
offshore bank receivership scenarios is some depositors get scared and
act jumpy and sue the bank. The lawsuits generally involve having the
court encumber or tie up an amount equal to their deposit. To accomplish
this the depositors generally have to resort to deceit or twisting the
truth minimally, to make the court think they were not ordinary
depositors or the amount in question consisted of funds to be handled in
a special exceptional manner. The way the depositors are playing their
hand is get the court to hold my money before the bank goes down
completely and then my funds get mixed in with all the depositors in the
fracas. If one files such a lawsuit they are generally excluded from
filing claims as regular creditors (depositors) of the bank in the event
of a liquidation and if they lose their lawsuit (an expected occurrence
if based on fraud or deceit) they can lose all. Usually several
depositors will file such lawsuits if there is any official action taken
against the offshore bank and this could push the offshore bank into
greater difficulty and if there is a bank liquidation it will be a most
complex one with a lot of depositors funds eaten up in legal fees.
No comments:
Post a Comment